Malware Has Long Been a Plague For Publishers. As Malvertising Gets More Sophisticated, How Can We Win?

As a publisher, the plague of malware in all its various forms, including bots, bugs, ransomware and worms, has always been a concern. However, one that’s particularly worrisome due to its direct link to revenue, is malvertising.

Site owners are searching for an innovative solution that keeps both revenue and safety in mind. As the industry struggles to come up with an answer, publishers continue to face several issues.

Consumers will do what’s necessary to protect themselves.

Millions of people turn to ad blockers as a way to protect themselves from malware, which means millions of people that publishers can no longer monetize. With fewer people to monetize, publishers have to get creative. One way they’re doing this is by creating new ad formats that sacrifice user experience in the name of revenue. (Auto-play video ads, for example.) Not surprisingly, this only motivates more people to go the ad-blocking route, because now in addition to protecting themselves, they want to avoid the nuisance of aggressive advertising.

Additionally, some publishers are experimenting with software that enables them to reach consumers even if they’ve installed an ad blocker. Others are asking or forcing visitors to whitelist their site so they can break through the blocker, but so far we haven’t heard any runaway success stories with any of these solutions. User response is mostly categorized as either negative or nonexistent.

The availability of new software may empower publishers to locate and solve issues on their own. We’ve made this a high priority at Freestar and are currently working with several partners to do our part…

Publishers lack the control they need.

As programmatic advertising becomes more popular and promising, the number of parties involved increases. This leaves less control in publishers’ hands and forces them to rely on their ad partners to deal with harmful ads. This is problematic for two reasons: 1) the ad exchanges themselves are still figuring out how to better identify the root of bad ads, and 2) ad exchanges feel less urgency than publishers to do so since they have less of a stake in the game. If consumers encounter a dangerous ad, they hold publishers and advertisers responsible – not ad networks.

Freestar is here to help.

The availability of new software may empower publishers to locate and solve issues on their own. We’ve made this a high priority at Freestar and are currently working with several partners, including Confiant and Blockthrough, to do our part. We’ve seen promising results in their ability to identify and block threats and have entrusted these partners with our publishers in mind.

Not to mention here at Freestar, we have a best-in-class team that understands the frustration of ad quality and we will continue to perfect our scanning, blocking and troubleshooting process to jump on any complaint as soon as it’s been received. We’re hopeful that as publishers across the industry also dedicate expertise and bandwidth to testing, our combined learnings will get us closer to a solution.

Share this:

Read More

Bad Actors, Bad Ad Quality, and just plain Bad UX
User experience (UX) refers to an end user’s interaction with a brand, its products, and/or its services. For publishers, good…
Everything You Should Be Asking About Ads.txt
The explosive way in which direct-sold inventory switched to programmatic left brands feeling unsure of which vendors were involved and…
Price Floors and Freestar’s Dynamic Flooring Technology
You’ve probably heard about price floors before. Since Google Ad Manager switched to the first-price auction model, there seems to…